|
Once Upon an Ass By Bruce Machado
So
the other weekend I saw quite a few women walking up and down the streets
of San Francisco with words on their asses, mostly the same words over and
over again. I guess they commonly subscribe to the philosophy of ‘its
not what you say but how you say it that matters’, that and ‘where you
say it’. I think that a woman who has a word or words stenciled,
stitched or otherwise printed upon the stretched tight backside of a pair
of shorts, sweats, or exercise pants should expect a few things to happen
while wearing such clothing in public. One:
People are going to look at her ass. Period. Somebody, even in a passing
glance, even if it isn’t me, is going to read what is there, bouncing up
and down as the ass message bearer walks on by. Two:
Sooner or later, probably sooner, somebody is going to “read” the
message bearer’s ass as well. They will mentally critique the overall
form of that pair of buttocks. The tighter the fabric covering the rump,
the more that the overall firmness, roundness, bulk, shape and curve of
the rear end, or lack thereof will all be evaluated. Said bottom might be
silently or even audibly praised, or not. Perhaps the ass message bearer
might even inspire a pair of onlookers to high-five in appreciation. Three:
After having absorbed so much gluteus detail, many readers of an ass
message will most likely and without much effort, now have a picture in
their minds of what the ass message bearer’s ass might look like
unclothed. The overall shape is of course most apparent when the fabric
covering the bum is tight - all which is left to visualize it a vertical
crack up the center, an accurate flesh tone and the occasional dimple. Sure,
one could argue that people will look at a stranger’s tush and visualize
or otherwise objectify those buns regardless of how much fabric is draping
the derriere, regardless of shape or size, regardless of whether or not
words are printed crosswise the taut fabric concealing the flesh. Some
strangers, some people on the street simply like to look at people’s
asses. But then again, when the word Abercrombie, or Nike, or Sweet, or
Pink is stitched in the dead center of a hindquarter, I feel that more
attention will be paid towards those particularly noticeable types of tail
ends. Human curiosity to read the bouncy ass message is sooner or later,
well, … going to be aroused. And the split second after the word has
registered in the ass gazer’s mind, they are left staring in
contemplation at a woman’s keister. It’s a kind of sexual
objectification entrapment. If
a woman has words covering her fanny, regardless of the language, her ass
is probably going to garner more attention than it would if the slate were
to be so to speak, blank. That just seems to be a common sense issue to
me. Call me silly, but whenever I look at a word, I am inclined to read
it. If a word is on the rear end of a woman walking away from my line of
sight then I’ll be looking directly at her ass in order to read what is
printed there. After reading so many literal messages that day, I began to
wonder about the symbolic. There
is a multi-layered symbolism inherent in every ass message bearer’s
message. There is the literal symbolism of a product or corporate name /
logo / advertisement and then there is also a certain amount of innuendo
associated with having a word affixed on a woman’s haunches. At the very
least, there exists the implicit meaning that ass message bearers are
comfortable enough being in public while having total strangers stare at
their heinies for at least as long as it take to read their cutesy ass
messages. At the most… well, I wouldn’t care to speculate too deeply
on the reasons why a woman would intentionally wear clothing with words
printed across the ass. I’m certain that some women like having their
asses ogled and some don’t. I’m also quite certain that some
percentage of the female population of San Francisco is quite proud of
their posteriors, proud enough to wear the word “PINK” on their
patooties. I would guess that the eyes of many folks linger a bit longer
after reading the word “PINK” on the lower south end of a north bound
woman. Might as well slap the word “FOCUS,” along her butt cheeks
instead. Or how about, to quote John Lennon, the word “IMAGINE”. Unless
I know a woman well enough and can get away with being the smartass that I
am (pun intended), I would never be so insensitive as to ask the
“PINK” ass message bearer, “Excuse me… but do you realize that in
wearing those shorts with the word pink printed on your buns in capital
letters that it appears to this casual observer as if you are objectifying
your own sex? How do you feel about that? Inquiring minds want to know.”
I would never make a comment like that to a total stranger, unless I was
really, really drunk. But there are those who will and they’ll do it
cold and more or less sober. I
think that any woman who wears an ass message pair of sweats or shorts
doesn’t have the right to become overly indignant if someone were to ask
such questions. For that matter, no woman who wears shorts with words on
the duff, especially the word “PINK” can claim the ignorance defense;
as in, “Gee, I never thought about it like that before”. Under such
circumstances, ignorance of the implied sexual innuendo is not a valid
excuse in my book. Those “PINK” asses know what they’re doing. They
might as well waltz down the street like the town crier, swinging a
cowbell while they cry out to gain the attentions of the citizens, “Hear
ye, Hear ye. Gaze upon my ass!” Really
though, I don’t care what clothing anyone wears. How a person choose to
accouter themselves and all their “hangy-down parts” is just fine by
me. However, in regards to the women who are the bearers of ass messages,
I would hope that those who unashamedly bear the word “PINK”
horizontally on their fundaments would at least have a sense of humor
about it. A
young woman that I observed recently did not. She had been wearing a skin
tight pair of pink shorts with the word “PINK” stenciled in the seat.
Unfortunately for her, the “N” was wedged up pretty thoroughly in her
vertical smile, so far in fact that it appeared as if she had the word
“PIK” on her ass. I
loved the irony of that. So did a street person lounging in front of a
laundromat that called out to her, “Hey woman, you ass says ‘PIK’.
You might want to listen to it.” Without
a backwards glance and sans any public ass picking to correct the
unintentional misspelling, the young woman silently replied by giving the
man the bird. To which he retorted, “Well shit lady, gimme a break will
yah? It’s not like I’m walking around in my underwear with the word
“COCK” on the front of it.” I
found his remark to be rather inspiring. It seemed to say, “Take that,
all you San Franciscan “PINK” asses.” Personally, I’m too passive
aggressive to be so flagrantly rude without direct provocation. My style
of rudeness is completely different. Yes,
that man’s remarks were inspiring. Maybe I’ll go to the local thrift
store and see if I can’t dig up a decent pair of men’s Dolphin shorts
from the eighties; a pair that doesn’t have the crotch worn out by
countless athletic hours of ball-sweat saturation. I’ll take them home
and have my wife sew onto the front of them the word “PACKAGE” and
then strut my word up and down the streets of San Francisco,
bouncy-bouncy. Imagine
that.
Copyright © 2007 Bruce Machado |
|
|
Bruce Machado is a MFA student in the Writing and Consciousness Program at New College of California, San Francisco. He lives in Santa Rosa. |
|
|
Reproduction of material from SoMa Literary Review pages |