Manifesto

Submit Your Work

Other Kewl SoMa Sites

Contact Us

Archive

Home

New Voices From San Francisco

WORD

PLAY HERE
    

 

  Manhandled
  Gripping Tales of Gay Erotic Fiction

  Edited By Austin Foxxe
  AOL/Time Warner
  334pp

  Book Review

Get a Grip

By Kemble Scott
Editor - SoMa Literary Review


The Pride season is here to remind us how far we’ve come. No one’s gonna push us around anymore. Even the US Supreme Court has taken our side! Now that we’ve fought so hard for our rights, what do we want more than anything else?

Well, uh, we want to be pushed around. Sir!

That’s the premise behind most of the stories in the new gay erotica collection Manhandled from AOL/Time Warner. The book plays to the idea that deep down what we’ve always really wanted is for some straight guy to grab us by the ears, confront us with an opened zipper and hear those loving words, “Eat it, faggot.”

You’ve come a long way, baby.

Not!

These are stories about aggressors and victims, where it’s accepted that we all crave to be raped and abused. To a lesser extent, this isn’t entirely untrue, of course. It’s part of our erotic nature to sometimes enjoy being taken – that we are the object of a lust so strong that it turns our lover into a demanding brute. Manhandled plays to those fantasies with often excessive tales of construction workers, cowboys and jocks.

Taken as a whole, however, it’s a bit depressing to think that these worn stereotypes are what some publisher believes we are still buying. In the world of erotica, we’ve failed to progress beyond the pulps. Even the language here is a tired throwback to the paperbacks of the closeted 1960s. Granted, it’s difficult for any writer to come up with words to describe the male organ that aren’t silly. But Manhandled is downright sophomoric with expressions like honker, pisser, poker, monster, putter, scepter, piston and schlong.

Haven’t any of these writers read Anais Nin? She aroused generations of readers without ever once using the phrase meat tube.

The only effort to bring these stories into the current millennium is one that turns out to be a mood kill: political correctness. In an apparent effort to promote safe sex, it looks like someone dropped into many of the stories requisite moments where (in the middle of a rape!) condoms and lube magically appear out of thin air. These inserts are nonsensical and ill-placed - the rubbers just as quickly evaporate in subsequent paragraphs, forcing the reader into a puzzle right at the moment he’s supposed to be experiencing climax.

There’s one exception to this mess. The short story “Critics Choice” by Ken Taggart introduces us to a writer who takes on a powerful literary critic. Besides creating an unusual context for sexual conquest, it is the only tale that is well written.

Unfortunately, there are twenty-six other lesser stories here, too many that prey on tired concepts of gay sexuality. Perhaps at this time of Pride we should celebrate the fact that we can have these fantasies, as old as they are, without guilt that we are dirty degenerates. Still, we can do better.

 

Copyright © 2003 Kemble Scott

Kemble Scott is an editor at SoMa Literary Review. A different version of this review first appeared in the San Francisco Bay Guardian.

WORD

PLAY HERE

Reproduction of material from SoMa Literary Review pages
 without written consent is strictly prohibited.
Copyright © 1999-2008
SoMaLit.com